Port-la-Nouvelle
Yashica Mat 124G
Kodak Ektachrome EPP
Yashica Mat 124G
Kodak Ektachrome EPP
| Speed | Use | |
|---|---|---|
| EPN | 100 | Daylight |
| EPP | 100 | Daylight, Extra Saturation |
| EPR | 64 | Daylight |
| EPX | 64 | Daylight (Warmer) |
| EPZ | 100 | Daylight (Warmer) |
| EPD | 200 | Daylight |
| EPL | 400 | Daylight |
| EPH | 1600 | Daylight |
| EPT | 160 | Tungsten (artificial light) |
| EPY | 64 | Tungsten |
| EPJ | 320 | Tungsten |
| EIR | 200 (E6) | Infrared |
| HCS | N/A | Lith* |

Seldom have I willed for someone's clothes to billow up as I willed Jenny Agutter's clothes to billow up, and sometimes dreams come true. Quite often in Jenny Agutter's case, if you've ever seen Walkabout. And Equus. An American Werewolf in London. China 9, Liberty 37. She's still going, you know, most recently in surprise BBC Sunday evening hit Call the Midwife, and has a small role in the forthcoming Avengers movie. I'd be good on the radio, wouldn't I? You're not allowed to stop talking on the radio, you have to keep going, and I can do that.
Ektachrome itself was developed in the 1940s, as an alternative to Kodakchrome that was easier to develop. Throughout most of its life it was faster than Kodachrome, and was popular with the Big Three - NASA, the National Geographic, and Playboy. Particularly NASA. Ed White floating in space? Ektachrome. Ed White's arse floating in space? Ektachrome. I won't link to that one, it would be disrespectful, although White had nothing to be ashamed of. AS11-40-5903? Ektachrome.
You know AS11-40-5903. No, it's not that one. That's AS17-148-22727. It's the other one, this one, Buzz Aldrin on the moon, reading a checklist on his left wrist. Kodachrome got all the boo-hoos when it was discontinued, but Ektachrome captured the most famous images of all. Since ever. Of them all.
All shot with a Yashica Mat 124G in Beziers, France, using Ektachrome Plus that expired in 2005. Same roll; of the three I didn't use one was crap and the other one was tilted a bit, and not quite as good. See what I mean about strike rate? I got nine good shots of eight different things, instead of 250 decent shots of eight different things.
Fabulous Sheep is a local band, by the way. Obviously the authorities don't want anybody playing with balloons 'cause they'll pop up in the trees there and frighten people.

Provia is Fuji's conventional slide film. It has a straightforward colour palette, neither purple nor green nor yellow, and of course Photoshop can work wonders with it. Point it at grey concrete, as I seem to have done, and you get the colour of weakened sunlight. As far as I can tell, Provia is Latin for for the road, or something like that. People called Roger they go the road. Overall it's a bit boring. No, perhaps a better word is transparent. It gets out of the way, rather than stamping its personality all over an image.
Underexpose it a bit and you get nice colour saturation, generally without Velvia's purple skies (they go deep blue instead):
Perpignan itself has a university, which probably explains the graffiti. It has an attractive central boulevard with a river, which is a five-minute walk from the train station. The town doesn't really have many tourist attractions - the castle in the centre, and the cathedral, which was being renovated when I was there - but it's very attract-ive, despite being surrounded by giant roads.
I used Kodak Ektar 100, a negative film that's made out of gold, and the drums start off backwards. It came... I mean it's not literally made out of gold. It's made out of silver. But somebody's bound to write in and say eww, I think you'll find film's made out of silver. I'm quoting from Jimi bloody Hendrix's Are you Bloody Experienced, heaven's sake. Some boring narrow-minded man is - always a man - is bound to say eww, you made a mistake there. Oh go away.
Bear in mind that the roll of Provia expired back in 2007. It's from the same packet as the cross-processed shots in the previous post, but developed normally. Back to Ektar:
Kodak has used the Ektar name before, for different things. There was a range of Ektar films in the late 1980s, early 1990s, with speeds from ISO 25 up to ISO 1000. Very obscure nowadays. Before that, many years ago, the name was used for Kodak's top-quality large format lenses, and is apparently an anagram of Eastman Kodak TessAR. Tessar is a type of lens, see, and it's also an anagram of stares, which are what you get when you take your trousers off in public. There will come a time, if it has not already come, when these names are worth more than Kodak's physical products.
So, Kodak Ektar. An anagram of raket and krate. Next stop: France.
A while back I got hold of some old Fuji Provia 100F that expired in June 2007. The very month that Gordon Brown became Prime Minister. A long time ago. Provia is Fuji's general-purpose slide film for normal everyday photographers rather than landscape photographers. Given that it was cheap and out-of-date, I decided to cross-process it. And write about it, in the style of John Brunner's The Sheep Look Up, with a guest appearance from the single best line in J G Ballard's High-Rise. Cheap and out of date.
Three films. The old films. There was normal slide film, with the colours. It was like looking into a dream, from before the air was too thick to see through. There was negative film. Black and white. And there was negative film again, but it wasn't right. It was colour, but backwards. The orange mask had gone. He could see a telephone box, grass. Probably real. It looked to be an expensive neighbourhood. Another mortar round struck, a few blocks away. It didn't matter any more.
Brigadier Neale pondered the report. The detonator had malfunctioned. Of the two bodies, one was a collection of bone shards and some burned scraps of hair and something that resembled an overdone sausage. The other was a former Captain in the Scots Guards. The pumping plant was ruined. The government would have to find another solution for the drought problem. That was not his problem.
She dreamed of a future where the fleas and lice were infested with people. Their turn to suffer, she thought. Don't give them a second chance. I will not go i will not go i and she went
... and with a swooshing sound reality returned. With the right processing the results look, well, normal. The Sheep Look Up is fascinating today. John Brunner had a knack for picking topics and issues that still resonate. The book was published in 1972, before I was born. Doctor Who had only just gone colour. It's about the end of America by plague and pestilence and fire, brought on by poor behaviour of the organisations that make the guns and butter and guns.
Characterisation? Not much. It's more of an assault than a book, and it's a shame Brunner couldn't have turned it into some kind of multi-media presentation, a kind of illustrated novel combining words and sounds and pictures and so forth. As a conventional film it might possibly work, but it would lose most of the novel's style, and the fractured narrative would be jarring. It's supposed to be jarring, but you can take your time when you're reading. Brunner was not a film-etic writer, unlike for example Michael Crichton.
Is it a good book? It's a memorable book. It must have knocked their socks off in 1972, and in fact it was nominated for a Nebula Award the next year. It lost to Isaac Asimov's The Gods Themselves, but that's awards for you. Despite apparently going out of print and never selling in great quantities it was the kind of novel that appealed to budding novelists, along with Brunner's previous book, Stand on Zanzibar. Paolo Bacigalupi's The Windup Girl, which won the Nebula Award in 2010, is based on an uncannily similar set of themes (plus genetic engineering, which doesn't feature in Sheep).


It doesn't have a lightmeter or a rangefinder or nuffin, but it is nice and sharp at f/16. And with ISO 100 film, at 1/100, that should be a good exposure for bright sunshine. But there isn't much bright sunshine in England in March, so I've had to dig out my lightmeter. More on this presently.
There Are Other Noises, that's an album title. I'd better write that down before I forget. The other images were shot with a 35mm camera, a Canon EOS 100, using a Sigma 15-30mm, at the Tate Modern. Ektachrome 100G.
There was a time when amateur photographers liked to bore party guests by showing off the slides they shot on their trip to India, or In-jah. Nowadays no-one projects slides. The same kind of people do the same kind of thing with blogs instead, or by forcing their victims to scroll through the pictures on their iPod.